IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR R.P.F.C. NO.137/2012 C/W R.P.F.C. NO.25/2012 IN R.P.F.C. NO.137/2012 BETWEEN :
G PRADEEP KUMAR S/O GURUSWAMY AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/O. NEKAR ROAD KONDLALLI POST MOLAKALMUR TALUK CHITRADURGA DIST-577 501.
(ADDRESS OF THE PETITIONER IS WRONGLY MENTIONED AS NO. 5183), NISARGA BEHIND ANJANEYA SWAMY TEMPLE ROAD ANJANEYA SWAMY EXTENSION DAVANGERE. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAGADISH S. HALASHETTY, ADV.) AND:
1. SMT. MALA L.M.
W/O. G. PRADEEP KUMAR AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 2. MASTER SIDDARTHA M.P. S/O. G. PRADEEP KUMAR AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS MINOR, REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN RESPONDENT NO.1 BOTH RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 ARE AT PRESENT RESIDING AT IST FLOOR, KD.NO. 782/254 OPP: CHIRANTANA DANCE CLASS 4TH CROSS, ANJANEYA SWAMY EXTENSION DAVANGERE-577 004. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.K. MANJUNATH, ADV. FOR R1 R2 MINOR REP. BY R1) THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4), OF FAMILY COURTS ACT, AGAINST THE ORDERS DATED:08.12.2011 PASSED IN CRL.MIS.48/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, DAVANAGERE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 OF CR.P.C. FOR MAINTENANCE.
IN R.P.F.C. NO.25/2012 BETWEEN:
1. MALA L.M.
W/O. G. PRADEEP KUMAR AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS NO.5183, “NISARGA” ANJENAYA TEMPLE ROAD BEHIND ANJENAYA EXTENTION DAVANAGERE-577 001.
PRESENT :
R/O. NO.894/4 C/O. SMT. MEENA L.M.
BEHIND MANJUNATHA COLLEGE BEERALINGESHWARA EXTENSION DAVANAGERE CITY-577 004.
2. SIDDARTHA M.P.
S/O. PRADEEPKUMAR G. AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS, SINCE MINOR REP. BY 1ST PETITIONER NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER C/O. SMT. MEENA L.M.
BEHIND MANJUNATHA COLLEGE BEERALINGESHWARA EXTENSION DAVANAGERE CITY-577 004. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B.K. MANJUNATH, ADV.) AND:
SRI. G. PRADEEP KUMAR S/O. SRI. GURUSWAMY U. AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS NO.5183, “NISARGA” ANJENAYA TEMPLE ROAD BEHIND ANJENAYA EXTENTION DAVANAGERE-577 001. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. JAGADISH S. HALASHETTY, ADV.) THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4), OF FAMILY COURTS ACT, AGAINST THE ORDERS DATED:08.12.2011 PASSED IN CRL.MIS.48/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, DAVANAGERE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 OF CR.P.C. FOR MAINTENANCE.
THESE R.P.F.Cs COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING :
ORDER Counsel for the petitioner in RPFC No.137/2012 and respondent in RPFC No.25/2012 has filed a memo submitting that in view of the compromise between the parties in MFA No.1639/2012, which is disposed of on 26.08.2016, these two petitions do not survive for consideration.
2. Counsel for the respondent in RPFC No.137/2012 and petitioner in RPFC No.25/2012 absent. No representation.
3. Perused the order passed in MFA No.1639/2012.
The terms of settlement as stated in paragraph 9 (iv) is that both the parties have agreed to withdraw RPFC No.25/2012 and RPFC 137/2012.
Considering the submission of the counsel, the memo is taken on record. Both the petitions are dismissed as the same have become infructuous in view of the compromise between the parties in MFA No.1639/2012 Since the main petitions are dismissed, the interlocutory applications for production of additional documents i.e. I.A.3/2012 in RPFC No.137/2012 and I.A.1/2014 in RPFC No.25/2012, are dismissed as the same do not survive for consideration.
Sd/- JUDGE rs