Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

G Jayaraman vs The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Secretary And Others

Madras High Court|12 September, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has reached the age of superannuation, hence nothing survives in this writ petition.
2.Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
12.09.2017 kas To.
1. The Secretary, The State of Tamil Nadu Highways Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-9.
2. The Chief Engineer, Highways Department, Chepauk, Chennai-5 .
W.P.No.23519 of 2004
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

G Jayaraman vs The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Secretary And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
12 September, 2017
Judges
  • M Dhandapani

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.