IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.NARENDAR R.P.F.C. NO.50/2017 BETWEEN G.CHANNAKESHVA S/O. GIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O. DODDAVALLABBI VILLAGE, NARASAPURA HOBLI-563101, KOLAR TALUK & DISTRICT. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. D.T.NANJESH GOWDA, ADV.-ABSENT) AND 1. M.AMARAVATHI W/O. G.CHANNAKESHVA, D/O MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, 2. KARTHIKA S/O. G.CHANNAKESHVA AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS, MINOR REPRESENTED BY MOTHER 1ST PETITIONER NATURAL GUARDIAN BOTH RESPONDENTS ARE R/AT LAKSHMISAGARA, MAZARA, KOOTERI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK & DISTRICT-563101. ... RESPONDENTS (SRIYUTHS. RASHEED KHAN AND SHANKARAMURTHY S.K, ADVOCATES) THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SEC. 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT 1984, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED: 17.08.2016 PASSED IN CRL. MIS. (FC) NO.24/2015 ON THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, KOLAR IS PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION UNDER SEC.125 OF CRPC., SEEKING FOR MAINTENANCE.
THIS RPFC COMING ON FOR ‘HEARING - INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION’ THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Case called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents have not deposited the amount as directed by this court vide order dated 22.03.2017.
3. It is seen that on the last occasion also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The case is called out, yet again there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Hence, the petition stands dismissed for non prosecution.
CT-HR Chs* Sd/- JUDGE