IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.59003 OF 2015 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN:
M/S.FUTURE CLOUD SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD., (REGD) REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR AND AUTHORIZED PERSON SRI VIKAS M. REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.322/20, 2ND FLOOR, 1ST MAIN CAMBRIDGE LAYOUT, ULSOOR BENGALURU-560 008.
(BY SRI.VISHNU HEGDE, ADV.) AND:
1. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY MINISTRY OF POWER AND ENERGY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU -560 001 … PETITIONER 3. CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR NO.927, L.J.AVENUE COMMERCIAL COMPLEX NEW KANTHARAJ URS ROAD, SARASWATHIPURAM MYSURU-570 009 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (ELEC) PORJECTS, CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED NO.927, L.J.AVENUE COMMERCIAL COMPLEX NEW KANTHARAJ URS ROAD SARASWATHIPURAM MYSURU-570 009 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S. SRIRANGA, ADVOCATE FOR R-3 & R-4; R-1 & R-2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 17.12.2015 BY THE R-1 TO R-4 I.E., ANNEXURE-A TO A-3 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri. Vishnu Hegde, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri. S. Sriranga, learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4.
The petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
2. In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks for a direction to respondent Nos.1 to 4 to consider the representation dated 17.12.2015 i.e., Annexure-A to A3.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos.1 to 4 to consider the representation dated 17.12.2015 submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 3 and 4 submitted that the representation submitted by the petitioner shall be dealt with in accordance with law, if not already decided.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the competent authority shall decide the representation submitted by the petitioner, if not already decided, in accordance with law by a speaking order within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.
6. With regard to other reliefs, which have been claimed by the petitioner, he shall be at liberty to take recourse to such remedy as may be available to him under law.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
sd/- JUDGE Mds/-