Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

F.Stephen vs The Conservator Of Forests ...

Madras High Court|06 November, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous as nothing survives. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. 06.11.2017 kas To
1. The Conservator of Forests (Research) Chennai 600 006.
2. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Panagal Buildings, Chennai 600 015.
W.P.No.16192 of 2007
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

F.Stephen vs The Conservator Of Forests ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
06 November, 2017