IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI C.M.P. No.54 OF 2015 BETWEEN 1. MR.FREDRICK I MENEZES AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS PRESENTLY RESIDENT OF CHIKKANAHALLI ESTATE BICCODU, BELUR TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT 573215. ... PETITIONER (BY:SRI ROHITH GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. M/S.KARE ELECTRONICS & DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD. A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE-NO.101, EDEN PARK, NO.20, VITTAL MALLYA ROADBANGALORE 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR S.R.AJITH, REPRESENTED BY HTIER GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER M/S.SKYLINE CONSTRUCTION & HOUSING PVT. LTD. A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.11, HAYES ROAD, BANGALORE 560 025 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR.AVINASH PRABHU.
2. M/S.SKYLINE CONSTRUCTION & HOUSING PVT. LTD. A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.11, HAYES ROAD, BANGALORE 560 025 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR.AVINASH PRABHU.
3. M/S.SKYLINE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES PVT. LTD. A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.11, HAYES ROAD, BANGALORE 560 025 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR.AVINASH PRABHU. ... RESPONDENTS (BY:SRI M.NIKHILESH RAO, ADVOCATE) THIS C.M.P. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 PRAYING TO REFER THE DISPUTE TO THE ARBITRATION AS PROVIDED IN CLAUSE 20.2 OF CLAUSE 20 CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT DATED 13.7.2007 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-B TO ANY PERSON QUALIFIED TO CONDUCT ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS PREFERABLE BY A RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE AT BANGALORE OR ARBITRATION CENTRE AT BANGALORE AS MAY BE DECIDED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT TO ADJUDICATE THE DISPUTES THAT HAVE ARISEN BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS C.M.P. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R The petitioner’s side has filed the memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw this petition.
2. The memo is taken on record. This petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE VGR