IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.11757 OF 2018 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
MR. FRANKLIN D' SOUZA S/O RAJARATHNAM AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT MERLIN HOUSE BANGARPET ROAD NEXT TO SRINIVASA NURSING HOME KOLAR-563 101.
(BY SRI. MANJUNATH B. N., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001.
... PETITIONER 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KOLAR-563 101 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TOWN POLICE STATION KOLAR-563 101.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIJAY KUMAR A. PATIL, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ROWDY SHEET AS PER ANNEXURE-D ISSUED BY R-3 AGAINST THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri. Manjunath B.N., learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri. Vijay Kumar A. Patil, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.
Petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of the parties, it is heard finally.
2. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petition be disposed of with a direction to Superintendent of Police, Kolar to consider and decide the representations of the petitioner in a fixed time limit.
3. In view of the submission made and in the facts of the case, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Superintendent of Police, Kolar to consider and decide the representations in accordance with law submitted by the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today by a speaking order.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
Sd/- JUDGE Mds/-