Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

M/S Fine Footwear Private Limited vs Skechers U S A Inc And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|27 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT REVIEW PETITION NO.304/2019 BETWEEN M/S FINE FOOTWEAR PRIVATE LIMITED, NO.30, 1ST FLOOR, ARCHANA MARKET, SULTANPET, BANGALORE – 560053, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, SRI.DEEPAK GULATI. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.SAGAR G NAHAR, ADVOCATE) AND 1. SKECHERS U.S.A. INC.
228, MANHATTAN BEACH BLUD, MANHATTAN BEACH, CALIFORNIA - 90266.
2. SKECHERS U.S.A. INC. II, 228, MANHATTAN BEACH BLUD, MANHATTAN BEACH, CALIFORNIA - 90266.
3. SKECHERS SOUTH ASIA PRIVATE LIMITED, 803 & 804, 8TH FLOOR, FULCRUM “B” WING, CTS NO.48, SAHAR ROAD, ANDHERI (EAST), MUMBAI - 400099.
4. SKECHERS RETAIL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, 803 & 804, 8TH FLOOR, FULCRUM B WING, CTS NO.48, SAHAR ROAD, ANDHERI (EAST), MUMBAI - 400099.
RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 4 ARE REPRESENTED BY VINAY GUPTA, FINANCE DIRECTOR, SKECHERS SOUTH ASIA PVT LTD.
5. PAVAN ENTERPRISES, SHOP NO.14, 2ND FLOOR, 1ST CROSS, LALABAGH ROAD, SUDHAMANGAR, BANGALORE - 560027, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER.
6. SAI VINAYAKA, NO.723, LAKSHMINARAYANA COMPLEX, MODI HOSPITAL ROAD, BASAVESHWARA NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560086. REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, 7. SHREE SHYAM FOOTWEAR, NO.720, 9TH CROSS, 2ND STAGE, MODI HOSPITAL ROAD, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, BANGALORE - 560086.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR.
8. FEET FASHION, NO.28, NTI LAYOUT, VIDYARANYAPURA MAIN ROAD, VIDYARANYAPURA, BANGALORE - 560097.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR. ... RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 R/W ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 15/07/2019 PASSED IN WP NO. 23009/2019, ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU.
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER No grounds made out for indulgence; dismissed.
However, this dismissal will not come in the way of petitioner urging the points in review as grounds for resisting the suit, if otherwise law permits.
Sd/- JUDGE cbc
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S Fine Footwear Private Limited vs Skechers U S A Inc And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
27 August, 2019
Judges
  • Krishna S Dixit Review