Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Fibroflex ( India ) Private Limited B Super I & Ii vs The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep By Its Secretary To Government Energy Department And Others

Madras High Court|28 June, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28.06.2017 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ W.P.No.28922 of 2003
and WPMP.No.35304 of 2003
Fibroflex (India) Private Limited B Super I & II, Industrial Estate, Pettai, Tirunelveli - 627 010 Rep by its Executive Director S.Sundaaresan ... Petitioner Vs
1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Secretary to Government Energy Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.
2. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, rep.by its Chairman, 800, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.
3. The Chief Electrical Inspector to Government Thiru Vi Ka.Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai 600 032.
4. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission, 17, III Main road, Seethammal Colony, Alwarpet, Chennai 600 018. ... Respondents
Prayer : - Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India pleased to issue a writ of declaration, declaring clause (a), (b) and (c) of Sub-Section (1) of Section 3 of The Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption or Sale of Electricity Act, 2003 (Act 12 of 2003) relating to levying of tax on the electricity as ultra vires the Constitution of India, illegal, invalid and unenforceable in so far as the members of the petitioner Association are concerned.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.S.Pandiyaraj Mr.P.S.Vasanthakumar For Respondents : Mr.S.K.Rameshwar
O R D E R
This writ petition is filed for issuance of a writ of declaration, declaring clause (a), (b) and (c) of Sub-Section (1) of Section 3 of The Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption or Sale of Electricity Act, 2003 (Act 12 of 2003) relating to levying of tax on the electricity as ultra vires the Constitution of India, illegal, invalid and unenforceable in so far as the members of the petitioner Association are concerned
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the very same issue involved in the connected writ petitions was taken up to the Supreme Court and the interim order granted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court bearing Special Leave Appeal (Civil) Nos.24685 to 24719 of 2012 dated 31.08.2012 restraining the respondents from taking any coercive steps. When the writ petition appeal of the similar nature was posted before the first bench of this Court in W.A.No.547 of 2004 and W.A.M.P.No.969 of 2004 and W.P.No.25851 of 2003 the first bench has passed an order dated 02.06.2015 observing that the result of the Special Leave Appeal mentioned above will govern the writ petition also. The order of the first bench is as under.
"In view of the issue raised in the present writ appeal/writ petition being settled against the appellant/petitioner in terms of the Division Bench judgment in W.P.Nos.159 of 2008 etc. (batch) decided on 15.06.2012 and thereafter, the Hon'ble, the Hon'ble Supreme Court having entertained the Special Leave Appeals against the said judgment bearing Special Leave Appeal (Civil) Nos.24685 to 24719 of 2012 dated 31.08.2012, with an interim direction restraining the respondents therein from taking any coercive steps for disconnecting the supply of electricity to the premises of the petitioner therein, subject to that petitioner paying all the charges/dues except tax calculated on the basis of maximum demand, it is agreed that the present writ appeal and writ petition be demand, it is agreed that the present writ appeal and writ petition be disposed of in terms aforesaid, with the agreement that the ultimate fate of the matter before the Hon'ble Supreme Court would also govern the present appellant and writ petitioner and the same interim order would continue to enure for the benefit of the writ appellant and writ petitioner during the pendency of the Special Leave Appeals".
3. In view of the order passed by the first bench of this Court in W.A.No.547 of 2004 and W.A.M.P.No.969 of 2004 and W.P.No.25851 of 2003 order dated 02.06.2015 this present writ petition is also disposed in the same line. The result of the Special Leave Appeals pending before the Supreme Court will govern the writ petitioner also. Till such time interim order granted by this Court will continue. Accordingly this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is also closed 28.06.2017 dpq/vv To
1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Secretary to Government Energy Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.
2. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, rep.by its Chairman, 800, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.
3. The Chief Electrical Inspector to Government Thiru Vi Ka.Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai 600 032.
4. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission, 17, III Main road, Seethammal Colony, Alwarpet, Chennai 600 018.
M.GOVINDARAJ,J
dpq/vv
W.P.No.28922 of 2003 and WPMP.No.35304 of 2003
28.06.2017
http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Fibroflex ( India ) Private Limited B Super I & Ii vs The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep By Its Secretary To Government Energy Department And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
28 June, 2017
Judges
  • M Govindaraj