IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.13350 OF 2014 (GM-SLUM) BETWEEN:
SMT. FAZILA D/O LATE ISOOF KHAN W/O KHALEEL AHMED AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS No.168, 1319 AVALAHALLI QUARTERS ANJANAPURA POST BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE URBAN-560062.
(BY MR. MOHAMMED SHAFI S, ADV.) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF VIDHANA SOUDHA AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560001.
2. THE KARNATAKA SLUM CLEARANCE BOARD No.55, RISALDAR STREET VV GIRI COLONY, SESHADRIPURAM BANGALORE-560020 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY/COMMISSIONER.
… PETITIONER (BY MR. V. SHIVAREDDY, HCGP FOR R1 MR. M.S. PARTHASARATHI AND MR. M.P. SRIKANTH, ADV., FOR R2) - - -
… RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DTD.28.8.2013 VIDE ANNEX-L AND ISSUE ALLOTMENT LETTER OF THE PROPERTY No.168, AT AVALAHALLI QUARTETRS/AVALAHALLI SLUM, ANJANAPURA POST, BANGALORE MEASURING 20 X 30 FEET & ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Mr.Mohammed Shafi S., learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr.V.Shivareddy, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1.
Mr.M.S.Parthasarathi & Mr.M.P.Srikanth, learned counsel for respondent No.2.
2. The writ petition is admitted for hearing.
With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
3. In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks a direction to the respondents to consider the representation contained in Annexure-L submitted by the petitioner.
4. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the representation submitted by them shall be considered. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law if not already decided.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the competent authority to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner, if not already decided in accordance with law by a speaking order within four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits.
Interim order, if any, to continue till the representation of the petitioner is decided Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE SS