Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Fatima Rizvi @ Fatima Taqvi vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2772 of 2019 Petitioner :- Fatima Rizvi @ Fatima Taqvi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Zafar Abbas Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
The exemption application is allowed.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A. G. A. for the State.
This writ petition has been filed with the prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned F. I. R. which has been registered as Case Crime No.691 of 2000, under Sections 109, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 408 and 120-B I.P.C. along with Section 13(1) (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, P.S. Kotwali, District Mau.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned first information report has been lodged by complainant containing absolutely false and concocted allegations against the petitioner with the ulterior intention of harassing petitioner; petitioner has been implicated on the basis of general allegation; further contention is that the first information report is dated 8.12.2000, she was not named in the first information report; the petitioner is a divorced lady with no previous criminal history aged about 54 years; reliance has also been placed the order passed in the case of co-accused, copy of which has been annexed on page 33 of the writ petition; apart from the bald allegations made in the impugned F. I. R., no evidence is forthcoming even prima facie indicating at the complicity of the petitioner in the commission of alleged offence and hence the impugned F. I. R. which is a bundle of lies and motivated by malice, is liable to be quashed.
Per contra, learned A. G. A. has submitted that from the perusal of the allegations made in the impugned F. I. R., it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out, hence the impugned F. I. R. is not liable to be quashed.
After having heard the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties present and perused the impugned first information as well as the other material brought on record, we are not inclined to quash the impugned F. I. R.
However, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, we dispose of this writ petition with the direction that the petitioner shall not be arrested in the aforementioned case till submission of police report under Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C., however, petitioner shall participate and co-operate with the investigation and the police authorities are directed to complete the investigation as early as possible, preferably within three months from the date of production of certified copy of the order.
Order Date :- 31.1.2019 Mini
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Fatima Rizvi @ Fatima Taqvi vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 January, 2019
Judges
  • Vipin Sinha
Advocates
  • Zafar Abbas