Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Fathima Nachair vs Tamil Nadu Wakf Board

Madras High Court|02 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The petitioner has come up with this Writ Petition seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to act in terms of Section 52 of Wakf Act, 1995 as well as the second respondent to pass necessary orders after holding an enquiry in respect of the property belonging to ''Shavilajat Fakir Dargah Wakf'' pursuant to the representations dated 26.02.2016 and 02.04.2016 made by her.
2. According to the petitioner, she is the hereditary Muthavalli of Shavilajat Fakir Dargah Wakf, Pallipadai, besides a person interested in Wakf under Section 3(k) of the Wakf Act, 1995 (43 of 1995). The Dargah owns property to the extent of 16.97 acres and the same is relevant in terms of bifurcation. As the Dargah/petitioner is entitled to get a Patta, the petitioner made an application to the Settlement Officer under Rule 9(1) of Tamil Nadu Minor Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Rules, 1965 for holding an enquiry to grant patta in favour of Shavilajat Fakir Dargah Wakf.
3. While so, it is the case of the petitioner that respondents 3 and 4 have encroached the Wakf property and are attempting to put up construction therein. Hence, the petitioner made number of objections in person as also by way of representations dated 11.11.2015 and 16.02.2016. Since there is a failure to act in conformity of Section 54 of the Wakf Act, the petitioner issued a legal notice dated 11.03.2016 to the respondents 3 and 4, stating that they have put up superstructure on the wakf land without any right as a lessee under the Wakf, that too without obtaining necessary sanction from the Wakf Board. The grievance of the petitioner is that since the Wakf Board has not taken any initiative, the petitioner has no other avenue except approaching this Court.
4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the material documents available on record.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs the 1st and 2nd respondents herein to consider the petitioner's representations dated 11.11.2015, 26.02.2016 and 02.04.2016 on merits and in accordance with law, after giving notice to the petitioner and respondents 3 and 4, and pass appropriate orders within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P.No.2528 of 2017 is closed.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Fathima Nachair vs Tamil Nadu Wakf Board

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
02 February, 2017