Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Farukh vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 September, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38383 of 2019 Applicant :- Farukh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Arun Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.
Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A. appearing for State and perused the record.
This application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed by Farukh for grant of anticipatory bail during the course of investigation in Case Crime No. 396 of 2019, under Section 3/7 Essential Commodities Act, Police Station Auraiya, District Auraiya.
Learned counsel for applicant argued that accused applicant has been falsely implicated in this case with accusation of having recovery of a manual gas refilling machine and four gas cylinders from his home. This recovery was admitted. Those cylinders were of neighbours, taken for purpose of some family function of applicant. He is of no criminal antecedent. Therefore, the applicant may be enlarged on anticipatory bail.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail, but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.
Having heard learned counsel for both side and gone through first information report, a case for anticipatory bail in this case is made out.
In the event of arrest of the applicant, Farukh, involved in above mentioned case, he shall be released on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. before the competent Court on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police office as and when required;
(ii) the applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police office;
(iii) the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.
In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.
The applicant is directed to produce a certified copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.
In view of aforesaid, the application for anticipatory bail is, accordingly, allowed.
Order Date :- 27.9.2019 NS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Farukh vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 September, 2019
Judges
  • Ram Krishna Gautam
Advocates
  • Arun Kumar Pandey