Heard Mr.MB Gandhi, learned advocate for the applicant and Mr.Soni, learned advocate for respondent No.2 and perused the relevant papers. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the FIR and the papers annexed with this application, pertaining to earlier civil suits and settlement papers, this Court is of the opinion that the matter requires consideration and, hence, rule, returnable on 19.4.2012. Mr.Soni, learned advocate waives service of rule for respondent No.2 and Mr.Raval, learned APP waives service of rule for respondent No.1. Interim relief granted vide order dated 19.5.2011, shall continue.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No 6976 of 2011 ================================================================ FAROOQ ABDULDUL RAHIM VORA & 2....Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 2....Respondent(s) ================================================================ Appearance:
MR MB GANDHI for Applicant(s) : 1, MR LB DABHI, APP for Respondent(s) : 1, None for Respondent(s) 2-3 ================================================================ CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.P.BHATT Date : 19/05/2011 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.P.BHATT) Heard learned Advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent State.
Perused the papers.
Having regards to the facts and circumstances stated in the application, NOTICE, pending admission, returnable on 16.06.2011.
In the meantime, ad interim relief in terms of para- 19-c) till the returnable date.
Direct service is permitted.
(P.P.Bhatt, J.) *Shitole Page 1 of 1 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Sun Mar 20 02:10:27 IST 2016 2 of 2