Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that, after the grant of bail, the applicants due to some unavoidable circumstances could not appear before the court on the date fixed, consequently, non bailable warrant was issued against the applicants and their bail was cancelled.
Learned counsel further submits that the applicants undertake that after release on bail they shall regularly attend the court on each and every date .
Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the applicants deserve to be bailed out. Let the applicants Fakru & Leela involved in Case Crime No.138 of 2004, Sessions Trial No. 250 of 2005, under Sections 147, 148, 224, 225, 332, 353, 186, 307, 504 I.P.C., P.S. Shergarh, District Mathura be released on bail on their executing a personal bond and furnishing two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:-
(i)The applicants will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
(ii) The applicants will not pressurise/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
(iii)The applicants will appear before the trial court on the date fixed.
(iv)The applicant shall report to the police station concerned in the first week of each month to show their good conduct and behavior.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions , the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 3.2.2010 vinay