Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Fahimuddin vs State Of U P Through Its Secretary

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6661 of 2018 Petitioner :- Fahimuddin Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Its Secretary (Revenue) And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Narendra Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State- respondents.
By means of this writ petition the petitioner, who is a Survey Kanoongo and posted at Allahabad and has been attached to the office at Tehsil Karchhana, has prayed for a direction to the authority concerned to decide his representation.
Various reasons have been shown in the writ petition that the transfer of the petitioner to Karchhana will cause hardship to the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already made a representation to the authority concerned, which has remained pending.
Let the representation of the petitioner be considered and decided by the authority concerned, in accordance with law, as far as possible, within a period of one month from the date a certified copy of this order is presented before it.
With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 26.2.2018 SKM
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Fahimuddin vs State Of U P Through Its Secretary

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 February, 2018
Judges
  • Abhinava Upadhya
Advocates
  • Narendra Srivastava