Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Faeem vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 October, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40104 of 2018 Applicant :- Faeem Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A. G. A. for the State.
Applicant has moved the present first bail application seeking bail in Case Crime No. 88 of 2018 under Section 302 of I.P.C., Police Station Qila, District Bareilly.
Applicant has been named in the first information report and who happens to be son-in-law of the deceased. Eye witness account is present. We have gone into the statement of Master Arfan who happens to be the son of the present applicant and as per the postmortem report, the deceased has received as many as sixteen injuries.
Looking to the seriousness of the allegation as made in the FIR, gravity of offence and the severity of punishment, no case for grant of any indulgence is made out.
Accordingly, the application for bail is rejected at this stage.
Order Date :- 26.10.2018 Ram Chander
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Faeem vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 October, 2018
Judges
  • Vipin Sinha
Advocates
  • Ashutosh