Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Fadali @ Rajiv Singh vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 July, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 80
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11442 of 2021 Applicant :- Fadali @ Rajiv Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
This application under Section 482 CrPC has been filed with a prayer to quash the charge-sheet no. 134 of 2016, dated 21.09.2016, cognizance/ summoning order dated 17.03.2018 and entire proceedings of S.S.T. No. 59 of 2018 (State Vs. Fadali @ Rajiv), arising out of Case Crime No. 175 of 2016, under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(2)5Ka of SC/ST Act, Police Station Baberu, District Banda, pending in the court of Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Banda.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that he does not want to press other prayers made in the prayer clause and has only made a prayer for expeditious disposal of his bail application in view of law laid down in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Considering the prayer of the applicant, it is directed that if the applicant appears before the court below and applies for bail within one month from today, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law.
For a period of one month from today or till the applicant appears and applies for bail, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him. However in case, the applicant does not appear before the court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against him.
With the aforesaid observations, this application under Section 482 CrPC is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 30.7.2021 Nadim Digitally signed by Justice Rajiv Gupta Date: 2021.08.02 14:07:51 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Fadali @ Rajiv Singh vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 July, 2021
Judges
  • Rajiv Gupta
Advocates
  • Anil Kumar Pandey