Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

E.Kamalakannan vs Thiru.S.R.Gandhi

Madras High Court|23 November, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that against the order passed in WP.No.10610 of 2008, the respondents S.M.SUBRAMANIAM.,J.
sk preferred W.A.No.2381 of 2012 and Honourable Division Bench of this Court admitted the appeal and the same is pending for adjudication and therefore, the present contempt application deserves no further consideration at this point of time. It is needless to state that after the disposal of the writ appeal, it is for the parties to initiate appropriate proceedings under the law.
3. Thus, no further adjudication in this contempt petition is required to be undertaken. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed. 23.11.2017 sk Internet:Yes Index:yes To
1.Thiru.S.R.Gandhi, The Senior Divisional Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, Chennai.
2.Thiru.V.K.Dhaka, I.P.S., The Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, Chennai-3.
CONT. P No.990 of 2014
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

E.Kamalakannan vs Thiru.S.R.Gandhi

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
23 November, 2017