Between :
W.P.Nos.28719 of 2014 Date : 5-11-2014 M/s. ECO GENIX AGRI SCIENCES, Represented by its Proprietor A. Madhusudhana Rao .. Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary (Agriculture), Secretariat, Hyderabad and another .. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sri Naga Praveen Venkayalapati Counsel for respondents : Assistant Government Pleader for Agriculture (AP) The Court made the following :
ORDER:
“ … to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of respondents in interfering with manufacturing, distribution and sale of the petitioner’s products of Gromax, Grow Zyme, Planto Zyme, Everest, Dollor, Excellator, Vamplus, Galmmour, Pushpak, Maxstim, Ecomycin, Ecomyte, Ecobeng, Leader, Ever, Shoot, Khazana, Wamp, Shipai, Master, Tiller, Shanthiman, Amruth, Lamp, Net, Shine, President, Exodust, E-Virus, Bio-Mass, Kohinoor, Robor, Navaratna, E-Cure, Asthra, Bramha, Vasista, Zolan, Khadgam, Janthar, Manasa, Varaham, Eco-Star as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and without jurisdiction and further direct the respondents not to interfere with in any manner in the manufacture, sale and distribution of the petitioner’s Bio-products …”
After arguing the case, Sri Naga Praveen Venkayalapati, learned Counsel for the petitioner, requested for permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to his client to file a fresh Writ Petition with all the necessary particulars pertaining to the establishment of the Bio-Products unit by the petitioner with documents in support thereof.
The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner in terms of the prayer made.
As a sequel to the dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.35952 of 2014 filed for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous.
Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy Date : 5-11-2014 AM HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.Nos.28719 of 2014 Date : 5-11-2014 ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief : ---
After arguing the case, ----, learned Counsel for the petitioner, requested for permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to his client to file a fresh Writ Petition with all the the petitioner with documents in support thereof.
The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner in terms of the prayer made.
As a sequel to the dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.--- is disposed of as infructuous.
Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy Date : 5-11-2014 AM