IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 27th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD AP.IM.NO.4 OF 2018 BETWEEN:
E-INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENTERTAINMENT INDIA PRIVATE LIMIED., NO.22 AND 24, SOMESWARA NILAYA, JAKKUR MAIN ROAD, AMRUTHAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 092. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KAILASAM.P ...PETITIONER (BY SRI NANDAKUMAR C.K., ADVOCATE) AND:
ARRIS SOLUTION INC., 3871, LAKEFIELD DRIVE, SUWANEE, GA 30024, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI AJAY J.NANDALIKE, ADVOCATE) THIS AP.IM IS FILED UNDER SECTION 9 AND AMENDMENT ACT 2015 (NO.3 OF 16) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996, PRAYING TO A. RESTRAIN THE RESPONDENT FROM STOPPING SUCH SERVICES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO ENSURE THAT THE SERVICES OF THE SET TOP BOXES INSTALLED BY THE PETITIONER WITH CUSTOMERS ARE NOT AFFECTED; AS PER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT DATED:28/07/2017, VIDE ANNEXURE-C, B. DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO RESTORE THE SOFTWARE DISCONNECTED IN ALL THE SET TOP BOXES AND ETC., THIS AP.IM COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER In view of the memo dated 23.02.2019 filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
A sum of Rs.1,00,00,000/-(Rupees one crore only) is said to have been deposited before this Court in terms of the order dated 30.11.2018.
Registry to release the same in favour of the petitioner.
SD/- SD/-
JUDGE JUDGE PB