Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Dudipala Akhela vs Chirra Bharathamma

High Court Of Telangana|19 December, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3552 of 2014 Date : 19-12-2014 Between:
Smt. Dudipala Akhela, W/o.Ravinder Reddy, 39 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o.Chilakamarri village, PA Pally Mandal, Nalgonda District.
and Chirra Bharathamma, W/o.Venkat Reddy, 55 years, Occ: Sarpanch of Chilakamarri village, PA Pally Mandal, Nalgonda District and others … Petitioner … Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3552 of 2014 ORDER:
This civil revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, questioning the inaction in proceeding further in O.P.No.1 of 2013 on the file of the Court of Junior Civil Judge-cum-Gram Panchayath Election Tribunal, Devarakonda, Nalgonda District.
Heard Sri Y.Ashok Raj, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ashok Goud Ponnam, learned counsel for the 1st respondent and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents 3 to 8.
The revision petitioner herein filed O.P.No.1 of 2013 on the file of the Court of Junior Civil Judge-cum-Gram Panchayath Election Tribunal, Devarakonda, Nalgonda District under Section 233 of the A.P.Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, seeking the following reliefs:
"i) The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to order for recounting of votes for deciding the correct number of vote’s in favour of the contested candidates and to decide the correct rejected votes poled in the Chilakamarri Grampanchayath Sarpanch election held on 31.07.2013.
ii) The arbitrary act of election declaration of presiding officer dated 31.07.2013 by declaring the Respondent No.1 as Sarpanch of the Grampanchayath Chilakamarri may be declared as illegal, void and by setting aside the said declaration as false.
iii) The petitioner may be declared as elected Sarpanch of Chilakamarri Grampanchayath after due recounting of votes.
iv) The cost of the petition may be awarded to the petitioner.
v) The Hon’ble Court may pass any other or further order or orders as deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the petition in the interest of justice."
The sum and substance of the grievance of the petitioner herein is that the Court below is granting time to the respondents unnecessarily for filing counters without any genuine reasons and not proceeding with the adjudication of the issue in the election petition. It is also the grievance of the petitioner herein that despite affording number of opportunities, the respondents herein are not filing counters. When the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the 1st respondent that the 1st respondent herein filed his counter in the month of October, 2014. Since the petitioner herein is seeking innocuous order, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the revision by fixing some time for disposal of O.P.No.1 of 2013 keeping in view the nature of controversy in the said original petition.
For the aforesaid reasons, the civil revision petition is disposed of, directing the Court of Junior Civil Judge-cum-Gram Panchayath Election Tribunal, Devarakonda, Nalgonda District to dispose of O.P.No.1 of 2013 on its file, within a period of one year from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this civil revision petition, shall stand closed.
A.V.SESHA SAI, J Date: 19.12.2014
siva
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3552 of 2014 Date : 19-12-2014 siva
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Dudipala Akhela vs Chirra Bharathamma

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
19 December, 2014
Judges
  • A V Sesha Sai
Advocates
  • Sri Ashok Goud