IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2016 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR M.F.A. No.4747/2014 (MV) BETWEEN:
1. DRAKSHYANI W/O LATE PARAMESHA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/O KURUVANKA VILLAGE BANAVARA HOBLI ARSIKERE TALUK-573103 2. MA. SAGAR S/O LATE PARAMESH AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS 3. KUMARI SAHANA D/O LATE PARMESH AGED ABOUT 6 YEARS 4. MA.SANJU S/O LATE PARMESH AGED AOBUT 6 YEARS APPELLANT Nos. 2 TO 4 ARE MINORS REP BY THEIR MOTHER SMT.DRAKSHAYINI APPELLANT NO.1 5. SMT. KAMALAMMA W/O LATE RANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS ALL ARE R/O KURUVANKA VILLAGE BANAVARA HOBLI ARSIKERE TALUK-573103 ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI.JAGADEESH.H.T. –ADV (ABSENT) AND:
1. SIDDESH MURTHY S/O KENCHAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/O KURUVANKA VILLAGE BANAVARA HOBLI ARSIKERE TALUK-573103 (OWNER CUM DRIVER OF THE AUTO BEARING NO.KA 13-A-6020) 2. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER REP BY BRANCH MANAGER UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO., LTD, SRI.VENKATESHWARA BUILDING B.M.ROAD, HASSAN-573101 ..RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:22.6.2013 PASSED IN MVC NO.412/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, MACT, ARASIKERE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT This court vide order 17.3.2015 was pleased to direct issuance of notice to the respondents. Office note states that notice is not issued for want of process fee etc. The appeal was listed on 27.4.2015 before the Registrar Judicial and a week’s time was granted to do the needful. But no steps have been taken to comply with the orders of this Court. It is apparent that the appellant is disinterested in prosecuting the appeal. The litigation absolutely lacks bonafides. Hence, the appeals stands rejected.
Sd/-
JUDGE rs