Heard Mr.P.Sivachandran, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.M.Suresh Kumar, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 27.08.2009, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period.
3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.
4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 27.08.2009, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 27.08.2009, to the second respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs.
cs To
1.The Superintendent Engineer, Trichy Electricty Distribution Circle, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Mannarpuram, Trichy District.
2.The Executive Engineer, Operational and Maintenance, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Lalgudi Taluk, Trichy District.