Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

D.Rajakumari vs S.Deenadayalan

Madras High Court|21 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 16.02.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 21.02.2017 under the caption ' for dismissal'.
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA.J srn
2. Even today (21.02.2017), when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner either in person or through counsel Hence, this Tr.C.M.P is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
21.02.2017 srn To
1. The Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu
2. The Sub Judge, Poonamallee Tr.C.M.P.No.402 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

D.Rajakumari vs S.Deenadayalan

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
21 February, 2017