IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 56623/2018 (S-KAT) BETWEEN:
DR. VISHWANATH REDDY S/O MUNI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS PRESENTLY WORKING AS CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, GENERAL HOSPITAL, SRINIVASAPURA TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563-138 NOW TRANSFER TO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER BETHAMANGALA, KOLAR DISTRICT. R/A SEETHAREDDYHALLI, YALDUR POST AND HOBLI, SRINIVASAPURA TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT-563-138 ...PETITIONER(S) (BY SRI./SMT : M/S SMRUTHI LAW CHAMBERS, MARUTHI S., ADV FOR PETR.) A N D:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE SERVICES, NO.105, 1ST FLOOR, VIKASASOUDHA, BANGALORE 560-001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE SERVICES, ANANDA RAO CIRCLE, BANGALORE 560-009 3. THE COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF COMMISSIONERATE, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE & AYUSH SERVICES, ANANDA RAO CIRCLE, BANGALORE 560-009 4. THE DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICER, OFFICER OF DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICE, KOLAR-517-247 5. DR.G.SRINIVAS, MAJOR IN AGE, WORKING AS TALUK HEALTH OFFICER, SRINIVASAPURA TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563-138.
…RESPONDENT(S) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS FROM THE RESPONDENTS, PERTAINING TO ANNEXURE-A AND GRANT THE FOLLOWING RELIEFS:- a) QUASH THE ORDER DATED: 13.12.2018, PASSED BY KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL IN APPLICATION NO. 8843/2018, CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH IS MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A SINCE THE SAME IS UNJUST AND OPPOSED TO THE PROVISIONS OF TRANSFER GUIDELINES. b) DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO CONTINUE HIM TO WORK AS CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE MEDICAL OFFICER, GENERAL HOSPITAL, SRINIVASAPURA. c) DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO PAY THE COST OF WRIT PROCEEDINGS TO THE PETITIONER.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER.
…4 ORDER None appears for the petitioner.
Inspite of sufficient time being granted, office objections are not complied.
Besides this, on the earlier date of hearing also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Finally, a week’s time is granted to comply with office objections, failing which the writ petition shall stand dismissed without reference to the Court.
SD/- JUDGE SD/- JUDGE T BY : JAY C BY : R R BY : JAY COPY SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR