IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.646 OF 2011 BETWEEN:-
DR VENUGOPAL S/O LATE M RAMARAO AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/A NO.95, SRINIVASA, 13TH CROSS ROAD, 8TH MAIN, II STAGE, BTM LAYOUT, N.S.PALYA, BANGALORE-560076 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI: SHIVARUDRA, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND K RAGHAVAN S/O K R KRISHNA IYENGAR, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/A NO.49, 12TH MAIN ROAD, 4TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560011 (BY SRI: B G SRIRAM, ADVOCATE) ***** …RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT PASSED THEREIN DT:19.4.11 IN CRL.A.NO.789/10 ON THE FILE OF THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND PRESIDING OFFICER, FTC-IV, BANGALORE.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Learned counsel for petitioner is absent.
Heard learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the records.
2. This petition is directed against the concurrent findings of the courts below holding the petitioner guilty of the offence punishable under section 138 of N.I. Act. The petitioner has not made out any error of jurisdiction or patent error in the findings recorded by the courts below so as to exercise jurisdiction under section 397 Cr.P.C.
Consequently, the criminal revision petition is dismissed. Amount in deposit shall be released to the respondent.
*mn/-
Sd/- JUDGE