IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR W.P.NO.4905/2017 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
DR. SUPRIYA NILAVAR AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, W/O. DR. ARUNACHAL M. RAO, D/O. K.B.NILAVAR, “DWARKA”, P.O.BOX NO.19, BRAHMAVARA-576213 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.A.ARIGA, ADVOCATE) AND:
DR. ARUNACHAL M. RAO AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, S/O. LATE MOHAN RAO, FLAT NO.23, MEENAXI, SWASTIK PARK, CHEMBOR, MUMBAI.
... RESPONDENT (BY SRI.S.V.ANGADI, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AT UDUPI PENDING IN O.S.NO.489/2012 FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO DISPOSE OF THE SAID SUIT WITHIN A PERIOD OF 3 MONTHS.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for petitioner submits that in view of the fact that matter is listed before trial Court for final arguments, prayer sought for in the present petition would not survive for namely, directing the trial Court to pass orders. Hence, he prays for petition being dismissed as having become infructuous.
In that view of the matter, writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. No opinion is expressed on the merits of case.
SD/- JUDGE DR