IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA BETWEEN: DR. RANJANA AGED 38 YEARS CRL.P.NO.6048 OF 2013 W/O DR. AVINASH KISHORE HOUSE NO. 18-71 PADMA NILAYA, KARNAD MULKY, MANGALORE TALUK D.K. DISTRICT.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUDESH KUMAR ACHARYA – ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR POLICE STATION RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR BANGALORE REP.BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BUILDING, BANGALORE -01.
2. PHOENIX ARC PVT LTD., NO. 87, 5TH MAIN 3RD STAGE, BEML LAOUT RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR BANGALORE – 560 098 REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY / MANAGER.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI .VIJAYA KUMAR MAJAGE – ADDL. SPP FOR R-1; SMT. SAVITHA .S. FOR SRI VIJAYA NARAYAN – ADV., FOR R-2) THIS CRL.P FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN CR. NO. 226/2013 OF RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR P.S., ON THE FILE OF THE IV A.C.M.M., BANGALORE.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking quashing of the proceedings against the petitioner in Crime No.226/2013 as the dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.2 has been settled. Affidavit to that effect is filed along with copies of the entire order sheet in DCP No.6076 in O.A.No.332/2009, copy of compromise application filed before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Karnataka, Bangalore and copy of three Demand Drafts for having paid the amount of Rs.7,25,575/- to respondent No.2-Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. under one Time Settlement Scheme.
2. Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the fact that the dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.2 has been compromised as reflected in the compromise petition filed before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Karnataka, Bangalore.
3. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, nothing further survives for consideration in this petition. Accordingly, the peititon is disposed of in terms of the above memo. Proceedings against the petitioner in Crime No.226/2013 is quashed.
Sd/- JUDGE TL