IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27th DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.13827 OF 2016 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1. DR. RAMACHANDRA REDDY @ DR. D. R. REDDY S/O LATE SRI. D. M. REDDY AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS R/O HOUSE NO.1, GREEN FIELD SINGAPORE GARDEN GUBALALA VILLAGE KANAKAPURA ROAD BENGALURU-560 085 2. DR. VANI D/O SRI. E. R. NAIDU W/O DR. DILIP CHAKRAVARTHY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/O NO.39, 1ST B CROSS BHAVANI HOUSING SOCIETY BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE BENGALURU-560 085 (BY SRI. P. N. RAJESHWAR, ADV.) AND:
… PETITIONERS 1. THE CHAIRMAN ANDHRA BANK GOVERNMENT OF INDIA UNDERTAKING ANDHRA BANK BUILDING SULTAN BAZAR, KOTI HYDERABAD-500 095 2. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER ANDHRA BANK GOVERNMENT OF INDIA UNDERTAKING SPECIALISED ASSET RECOVERY MANAGEMENT BRANCH (SARM BRANCH) NO.4-5-1 TO 23, SULTAN BAZAR HYDERABAD-500 095 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T. P. MUTHANNA, ADV.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER VIDE ITS NOTICE DATED 11.11.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri. P.N. Rajeshwar, learned counsel for the petitioners.
Sri. T.P. Muthanna, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
The petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
2. In this petition, the petitioners inter alia seek for a direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioners vide notice dated 11.11.2015 vide Annexure-D.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation dated 11.11.2015 submitted by the petitioners, in accordance with law.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the representation submitted by the petitioners shall be dealt with in accordance with law, if not already decided.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the competent authority shall decide the representation submitted by the petitioners, if not already decided, in accordance with law by a speaking order within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE Mds/-