Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Dr Ragavi V And Others vs Union Of India Ministry Of Labour & Employment Government Of India And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|18 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION Nos.43040 – 43045/2018 (EDN – RES) BETWEEN:
1. Dr. RAGAVI V., D/O VENKATARAMANAN AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/AT ESICMC & PGIMSR PG GIRLS HOSTEL ROOM No.FF-08, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-10.
2. Dr. PRASHANTH, S/O MAHADEVAIAH M., AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/AT ESICMC & PGIMSR PG BOYS HOSTEL ROOM No.420, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-10.
3. Dr. SURENDRAN Y., S/O VEERAPPAN AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/AT ESICMC & PGIMSR PG BOYS HOSTEL ROOM No.419, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-10.
4. Dr. BHARATH M. NAIK, S/O MANOHARA NAIK, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT ESICMC & PGIMSR PG BOYS HOSTEL ROOM No.610, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-10.
5. Dr. NANDARAJ H., S/O HANUMANTHARAJU B., AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, PG STUDENT, R/AT ESICMC & PGIMSR PG BOYS HOSTEL ROOM No.419, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-10.
6. Dr. PREETI SHANKAR MALAPURE, D/O SHANKAR MALAPURE AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, PG STUDENT R/AT ESICMC & PGIMSR PG GIRLS HOSTEL ROOM No.G-06, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-10. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI AKKAMAHADEVI HIREMATH, ADV.) AND:
1. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NIRMAL BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-110011 REP BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA, POCKET 14, SECTOR 8, DWARKA, PHASE-1, NEW DELHI-110077 REP BY ITS SECRETARY.
3. EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, HQRS. OFFICE, PANCHADEEP BHAVAN, C.I.G. MARG, NEW DELHI-110002 REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER.
4. THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, MODEL HOSPITAL & PGIMSR, RAJAJINAGAR, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-560010 REP BY ITS DEAN.
5. THE DEPUTY MEDICAL COMMISSIONER (ME) EMPLOYEES’ STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, PANCHDEEP BHAVAN, CIG ROAD, NEW DELHI-110002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B.M.KUSHALAPPA, ADV. FOR R-1; SRI N.KHETTY, ADV. FOR R-2;
SMT.GEETHADEVI M. PAPANNA, ADV. FOR R-3 TO R-5.) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE MEMORANDUM DATED 19.06.2018 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT ON THE APPROVAL OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-C AND THE CIRUCLAR DATED 29.06.2018 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-D AND CONSEQUENTIALLY TO PAY THE MONTHLY STIPEND TO THE PETITIONERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo submitting that the writ petitions do not survive for consideration and deserves to be dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
2. The said memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, the writ petitions stand dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE NC.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Dr Ragavi V And Others vs Union Of India Ministry Of Labour & Employment Government Of India And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
18 July, 2019
Judges
  • S Sujatha