Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Dr N Chandrashekar vs The Regional Transport Authority Chickamagaluru And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|14 October, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.59201/2016 (MV) BETWEEN:
Dr. N.CHANDRASHEKAR S/O LATE K.NINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, SIDDARAMESHWARA MOTOR SERVICE, KADUR, CHICKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 548. …PETITIONER (BY SRI B.R.SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADV.) AND:
1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHICKAMAGALURU- 577 101 BY ITS SECRETARY 2. SRI N.SIDDARAMAPPA S/O SRI K.NINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, SIDDARAMESHWARA MOTOR SERVICE, KADUR, CHICKMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 548 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHIVAPRABHU S. HIREMATH, AGA FOR R-1; SRI M.E.NAGESH, ADV. FOR R-2.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE - 2 -
TRIBUNAL PASSED IN APPEAL No.840 OF 2015 DATED 15.02.2016 MARKED UNDER ANNEXURE-C.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for the parties have filed a joint memo submitting that the writ petition may kindly be dismissed as not pressed as the matter is settled out of Court.
2. Memo is placed on record.
Writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed in terms of the joint memo filed by the parties.
Sd/- JUDGE NC.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Dr N Chandrashekar vs The Regional Transport Authority Chickamagaluru And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
14 October, 2019
Judges
  • S Sujatha