Court No. - 89
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7990 of 2021 Applicant :- Dr. Kamal Verma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rahul Pandey
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Vinod Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A. for State and Mr. Rahul Pandey, learned counsel for informant/opposite party no.2.
Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for applicant in Court today is taken on record.
This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by applicant- Dr. Kamal Verma, in connection with Case Crime No.47 of 2019, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406 I.P.C.
and Sections 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station- Mahila Thana, District- Ghaziabad.
At the very outset, learned A.G.A. submits that summon has been issued by Family Court, Ghaziabad against applicant in above-mentioned case crime number.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused and also judgment of Apex Court in P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198, this Court does not find any exceptional ground to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the present application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
Order Date :- 5.4.2021 Saif