JUDGMENT Rakesh Tiwari, J.
1. By means of Annexure-1 to the writ petition, the petitioner was given ad hoc promotion on the post of Seasonal Naib Tahsildar. This promotion of the petitioner was till further orders. By means of Annexure-7 to the writ petition, the petitioner has not been granted further extension to work on the post of Naib Tahsildar and has been directed to work on his substantive post of Collection Amin. The petitioner has prayed for quashing of the orders dated 5.6.1995 and 7.6.1995 and further that he may be permitted to continue as Naib Tahsildar in Tahsil Shikohabad, district Firozabad. No interim order was granted in favour of the petitioner at the time of filing of the writ petition in the year 1995.
2. The counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been reverted on the post of Collection Amin without any opportunity. This contention of the petitioner is wholly misconceived as he was not given any promotion to the post of Naib Tahsildar after following the procedure prescribed. He was only directed for the time being to work on the post of Naib Tahsildar on seasonal basis by means of the order dated 18.2.1987. Thus, taking the charge of Naib Tahsildar from the petitioner and asking him to continue on his substantive post of Collection Amin does not amount to reversion.
3. No other point has been argued in the case except that the Court may direct the respondents to continue the petitioner on the post of Naib Tahsildar. The impugned orders have already been given effect to. The counsel for the petitioner could not point out any infirmity or illegality in the impugned orders. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this direction cannot be issued inasmuch as the Impugned orders have already been given effect to.
4. The writ petition is dismissed.