Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Dinesh Singh And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 42447 of 2002 Petitioner :- Dinesh Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Bhushan,Arpan Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioners have sought following relief:
"Issue a writ of mandamus, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to release the salary of the petitioners and pay their salary with effect from the month of July, 1998 till date and continue to pay the same regularly month to month as and when it falls due in future;"
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also relief sought and find that petitioners are not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting relief, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioners have lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioners is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 27.2.2019 Siddhant Sahu
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Dinesh Singh And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Anil Bhushan Arpan Srivastava