Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 6
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2996 of 2018 Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravindra Nath Yadav,Akhilesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manoj Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.
Heard Shri Akhilesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for the respondents no. 1 to 4 and Shri Manoj Kumar Yadav, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 5.
The petitioner in the writ petition is seeking a direction to the respondents to remove the illegal encroachment of the respondents no. 6 to 10 from the Gaon Sabha Land i.e. Nali Nalkoop (Gata No. 358 area 0.56 decimal/0.227 hectare) situated in village Gopalpur Pargana Barsathi Tehsil Madiyahun District Jaunpur. The relevant extract of revenue records have been filed as Annexure- 1 and 2 to the writ petition.
No useful purpose would be served in keeping this writ petition pending.
This writ petition is therefore disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 4-Tehsildar Tehsil Madiyahun District Jaunpur to enquire into the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order.
It is made clear that the court has not adjudicated the claim of the petitioner on merit.
Order Date :- 27.2.2018 o.k.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2018
Judges
  • B Amit Sthalekar
Advocates
  • Ravindra Nath Yadav Akhilesh Kumar Yadav