Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Dimpal Kumar Shah D

High Court Of Gujarat|11 May, 2012
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Admit. With the consent of both the sides, the matter is taken up for final hearing today. 1. In connection with the vehicular accident that took place on 30.07.2010 involving the Tanker bearing registration No. GJ-6-Z-9158 and in which Manojbhai Jesingbhai Vaghela expired, the legal heirs of deceased had preferred claim petition being M.A.C.P. No.1102/2010 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Rajkot. The said claim petition was allowed in part by judgment and award dated 20.10.2011. Being aggrieved by the same, the appellant-Insurance Company has preferred the present appeal.
2. It has been mainly contended on behalf of the appellant-Insurance Company that though specific contentions were raised before the Tribunal regarding liability of the Insurance Company, apart from other contentions, the same were not appreciated by the Tribunal in its proper perspective. Reliance has been placed on the decision of the Apex Court in the case of National Insurance Co. v. Sinitha and others, (2012) 2 SCC 356 [2011 (13) SCALE 84].
3. Heard learned counsel Mr. Nanavati and learned counsel Mr. Nisarg Desai. Considering the facts of the case and in view of the principle rendered in Sinitha's case (supra), it would be appropriate that the Tribunal re-considers the matter afresh.
4. Hence, the following order is passed;
(i) The appeal is allowed in part.
(ii) The impugned judgment and award is quashed and set aside and the matter is remanded to the Tribunal concerned for consideration afresh in light of the decision rendered in Sinitha's case (supra).
(iii) The Tribunal concerned shall decide the claim petition within a period of eighteen months from the date of receipt of writ of this order.
(iv) Both the sides shall be at liberty to adduce evidence, which shall be duly considered by the Tribunal, in view of the decision of the Apex Court, as referred to herein above.
(v) Until the claim petition is decided, the Tribunal concerned shall invest the entire amount lying with it in FDR with any nationalized Bank. If the same has not been deposited so far, it shall be deposited within a period of six weeks from today. Interest accruing thereon shall be accumulated.
(vi) However, the claimants shall be entitled for periodical interest up to the date of this order. The entire amount, including interest, shall be disbursed in favour of the party, who finally succeeds in the claim petition, after giving necessary set-off against payments that may have been made earlier.
(vii) This order of remand has been passed in light of the decision rendered in Sinitha's case (supra) and not on merits and therefore, the Tribunal shall decide the issue afresh on its own merits being uninfluenced by this order.
(viii) The appeal stands disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs.
(ix) R & P, if lying with this Court, be sent back. The amount lying with this Court be also transmitted to the Tribunal concerned.
[K. S. JHAVERI, J.] Pravin/*
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Dimpal Kumar Shah D

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
11 May, 2012
Judges
  • Ks Jhaveri Fa 1394 2012
Advocates
  • Mr Vibhuti Nanavati