Heard Mr.D.S.Vasavada, learned advocate for the petitioner. It is submitted by him that the impugned judgment of the Labour Court is not in accordance with law as, after having found that the petitioner has completed 240 days of work during his tenure of service, and in spite of the fact that another person has been appointed in the place of the petitioner, the relief of reinstatement has not been granted to him. Instead, compensation of only Rs.10,000/- has been awarded. The learned advocate for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the following judgments :
(i) Harjinder Singh Vs. Punjab State Warehousing Corporation, reported in AIR 2010 Supreme Court 1116.
(ii) 2010 III LLJ - 1 (SC) Issue Notice returnable on 25.06.2012.
(Smt.
Abhilasha Kumari, J.) Gaurav+ Top