Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Dilawar vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 24
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16857 of 2018 Applicant :- Dilawar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has wrongly been roped in this case. Recovery is false, planted and is not supported by any independent evidence. 250 grams intoxicating powder is alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant. Apart to this, two persons were arrested in this case, but they were not informed about their legal rights separately, but a joint offer was given to them, which is illegal. Thus, the mandatory provisions of N.D.P.S Act have not been complied with in the present case. The applicant is in jail since 30.1.2018 and in case he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the quantity of recovered contraband, nature of the offence, provisions for release of accused on bail, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, and submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Dilawar involved in Case Crime No.19 of 2018 under Section 8/22 NDPS Act, Police Station Mughal Sarai, District - Chandauli be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, complainant is free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this Court.
Order Date :- 30.5.2018 ss
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Dilawar vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 May, 2018
Judges
  • Om Prakash Vii
Advocates
  • Ashutosh Tiwari