Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Dhram Raj Yadav vs State Of Uttar Pradesh

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6877 of 2021 Petitioner :- Dhram Raj Yadav Respondent :- . State Of Uttar Pradesh, Through Principal Secretary Home Counsel for Petitioner :- Dipak Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition.
The written instruction supplied by the learned AGA is taken on record.
The office shall upload the instruction within 24 hours.
It is contended therein that the investigation has been concluded and the charge sheet has been submitted before the competent court.
In view of the above, the writ petition is rendered infructuous with the liberty reserved to the petitioner to approach the competent court to assert that the investigation has not been concluded in a fair and proper manner and further investigation is needed to discern the truth.
Dismissed as such.
Order Date :- 21.9.2021 Himanshu Digitally signed by SUNITA AGARWAL Date: 2021.09.23 17:27:53 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by MANJU RANI CHAUHAN Date: 2021.09.24 11:33:20 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Dhram Raj Yadav vs State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 September, 2021
Judges
  • S Sunita Agarwal
Advocates
  • Dipak Srivastava