Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Dharmendra Kumar vs State Of U.P.Thru. Prin. Secy. ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 August, 2019

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J.
Heard Sri Ram Nath Pandey, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Additional Government Advocate.
This petition has been filed for quashing the First Information Report in Case Crime No.187 of 2019, under Sections 363/366 I.P.C. and Sections 7/8 of POCSO Act, P.S.Tarun, District Ayodhya.
Learned Additional Government Advocate has informed that the petitioner has an efficacious and alternative remedy under Section 438 Cr.P.C. wherein the petitioner ought to have moved an application for anticipatory bail before appropriate Court. However, counsel for the petitioner says that he will require a little time to avail the remedy.
Accordingly, ten days' time from today is allowed to the petitioner for approaching the appropriate court and availing the remedy. Till the said period of ten days from today, the petitioner shall not be arrested in the aforesaid case crime.
With the above observations the writ petition stands dismissed.
Order Date :- 27.8.2019 Irfan
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Dharmendra Kumar vs State Of U.P.Thru. Prin. Secy. ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 August, 2019
Judges
  • Shabihul Hasnain
  • Narendra Kumar Johari