Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Dharmendra @ Babloo vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32555 of 2018 Applicant :- Dharmendra @ Babloo Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Adarsh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Dharmendra @ Babloo with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 161 of 2018, under Sections 379, 411, 420 IPC, Police Station Mangalpur, District- Kanpur Dehat, during pendency of trial.
It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is not named in the first information report. The applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with some ulterior motive. He does not have any criminal history to his credit. The applicant is languishing in jail since 03.6.2018. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserves any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.
Having considered the submissions of the parties, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant Dharmendra @ Babloo involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 27.8.2018 Ruchi Agrahari
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Dharmendra @ Babloo vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 August, 2018
Judges
  • Siddharth
Advocates
  • Adarsh Kumar