Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 16863 of 2002 Petitioner :- Dharam Veerm Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru' Secy. U.P. Govt. & Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- R.P.S. Kashyap Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
“(a) to issue a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 2.4.2002 (Annexure no. 5 to the writ petition).
(b) to issue a writ of mandamus directing to respondents no. 3 release the salary of the petitioner with effect from Fab. 2002 forthwith and further be directed by way of writ of mandamus not to terminate the service of the petitioner in view of the government order dated 28.1.2002.”
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.8.2018 PS