Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

M/S.Dhanapal Electronics vs The Commercial Tax Officer

Madras High Court|23 November, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondent. Heard both. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of assessment passed under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 for the year 2013-14.
3. The petitioner cannot claim that there has been a violation of the principles of natural justice, since the petitioner did not file their objections to the revision notice dated 27.5.2016.
4. However, the petitioner would point out that in the impugned order dated 16.6.2016 as well in the notice dated 27.5.2016, the respondent has not stated as to how the claim of input tax credit has been wrongly made and how it contravenes Section 19(11) of the said Act.
5. On a perusal of the impugned order, it is seen that the petitioner is not fully correct, because in the sub-column, the respondent referred to it as belated claim for input tax credit. Thus, the petitioner was bound to explain that there was no delay in the claim for input tax credit. However, considering the fact that already the assessment has been completed, this Court is of the view that the petitioner can be afforded an opportunity of personal hearing to go before the Assessing Officer.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to pay 15% of the disputed tax within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If such payment is made, then the petitioner will be entitled to treat the impugned proceedings as a show cause notice and submit their objections along with remittance challan and after receipt of the objections along with remittance challan, the respondent shall afford an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and proceed to redo the assessment in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks thereafter. No costs. Consequently, the above WMPs are closed.
23.11.2017 Internet : Yes To The Commercial Tax Officer, Arni, Tiruvannamalai District.
RS T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J RS WP.No.30068 of 2017&WMP Nos.32639 & 32640 of 2017 23.11.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S.Dhanapal Electronics vs The Commercial Tax Officer

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
23 November, 2017