Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Devendra vs Khadi

High Court Of Gujarat|24 January, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard Mr.Vaishnav, learned advocate for the petitioner.
It appears from the impugned order in the petition, whereby the petitioner has been denied the benefits of pension, which is at Annexure-A to the petition dated 27.09.2010, stating that the petitioner, being in the cadre of trading, is not entitled to pensionary benefits. Learned advocate for the petitioner states that similarly situated persons i.e. persons belonging to the trading cadre have been given benefit of pension by the respondent-Commission. Hence, NOTICE returnable on 16.02.2012. Over and above the usual mode of service, the petitioner is permitted to effect service by Regd. Speed Post to respondent No.1 at the cost of the petitioner. Direct service is permitted qua respondent No.2.
Sd/-
[R.M.CHHAYA, J ] *** Bhavesh* Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Devendra vs Khadi

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
24 January, 2012