In this mentioned case, counsel for the appellant informed that counsel for the respondent had refused to take notice of his mention. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. The sole appellant had died and substitution application no.38320 of 2016 alongwith delay condonation application no. 38318 of 2016 has been filed for substitution of sole appellant. Inspite of opportunity being afforded, no objection was filed by respondent side. The grounds mentioned in delay caondonation application appears sufficient and no objection has been filed against it, as such, delay condonation application is allowed. No objection has been filed against substitution application, as such, this application is allowed. Office is directed to incorporate amendment in memo of appeal accordingly. List this case in 3rd week of August, 2016 for hearing. Order Date :- 20.5.2016 Sanjeev .
Court No. - 19 Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 848 of 2012 Appellant :- Deo Narain Mishra Respondent :- M/S Ashish Medical Hall Thru' Partner & Others Counsel for Appellant :- O.P. Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- K.P.S. Yadav In Re: Delay condonation application no. 38318 of 2016 Hon'ble Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.
Allowed.
For order, see order of date passed on order sheet. Order Date :- 20.5.2016 Sanjeev .
.
Court No. - 19 Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 848 of 2012 Appellant :- Deo Narain Mishra Respondent :- M/S Ashish Medical Hall Thru' Partner & Others Counsel for Appellant :- O.P. Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- K.P.S. Yadav In Re; Substitution application no. 38320 of 2016 Hon'ble Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.
Allowed.
For order, see order of date passed on order sheet. Order Date :- 20.5.2016 Sanjeev