Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Dena Bank vs Sri. Venkateswara Silk Mills

Madras High Court|18 September, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel for the plaintiff has made the following endorsement:
"The suit has been settled out of Court. The suit may be dismissed as settled out of Court. Court fee paid may be ordered to be refunded. The documents relating to the mortgaged property listed in schedule 'B' to the plaint may be ordered to be returned to the plaintiff's counsel so as to hand over to same to the plaintiff for enabling them to return the same to the mortgagors."
2. In view of the same, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn as settled out of the Court. The refund of entire Court fees has to be granted.
3. It is also represented that the original documents had been filed along with the plaint. The Registry is directed to return the same, after obtaining copies of the documents to the learned counsel for the plaintiff under proper acknowledgment. The suit is dismissed as withdrawn as settled out of the Court.
18.09.2017 sji/srn C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
sji C.S.No.1973 of 1995 18.09.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Dena Bank vs Sri. Venkateswara Silk Mills

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
18 September, 2017