Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

The Deity Sri Vittal Mandir vs Mr Babu

High Court Of Karnataka|30 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT CIVIL REVISION PETITION.No.26 OF 2014 BETWEEN THE DEITY SRI VITTAL MANDIR MANAGED BY BHAVASAR KSHATRIYA BAVEESPET COMMITTEE, No.38, K KAMARAJ ROAD, BANGALORE-560 042.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY MR GHANSHAMJI M E ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. VISHWANATH SHENDGE, ADVOCATE - NO REPRESENTATION) AND MR. BABU, S/O LATE R. PARVATHI, R/A PORTION OF PREMISES No.122, VEERAPILLAI STREET, BANGALORE-560 001.
... RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT SERVED-UNREPRESENTED) THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE SMALL CAUSE COURT ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 26.9.2012 PASSED IN S.C.No.15601/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE XV ADDL.
JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MAYOHALL UNIT, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR POSSESSION.
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER No representation for the petitioner in the morning as well as when the case called in the second round. The order sheet shows that the counsel for the petitioner is absent continuously on 06-12-2018, 14-2-2019, 01-3-2019, 21-3-2019 and on 11-4-2019.
It is apparent from the order sheet that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE SMJ
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

The Deity Sri Vittal Mandir vs Mr Babu

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
30 July, 2019
Judges
  • S G Pandit Civil