Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Deepu @ Deepak vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 March, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11430 of 2018 Applicant :- Deepu @ Deepak Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Goyal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J.
Heard Sri Ashish Goyal, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Janardan Yadav, learned Brief Holder for the State.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that five cases have been shown against the applicant in the Gang Chart which has been annexed at page-16 of the bail application and in the said cases, the applicant has been granted bail by the competent Court. The applicant is in jail since 17.2.2017.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the nature of submissions advanced and the provisions of Section 19 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, let the applicant- Deepu alias Deepak involved in Case Crime No. 66 of 2017, under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station- G.R.P. Agra Fort, District Agra be enlarged on bail on his executing a personal bond of Rs. 2 lakh with two heavy sureties (one should be of his family member), each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following condition:-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the aforesaid case and conclude the same within preferably a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if, there is no legal impediment.
Order Date :- 29.3.2018 A.K.Srivastava
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Deepu @ Deepak vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 March, 2018
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Ashish Goyal