Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Deepankar vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 September, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40670 of 2019 Applicant :- Deepankar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Kailash Nath Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Heard Sri Kailash Nath, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Mohd. Nadeem, learned A. G. A. appearing for the State and perused the record..
Applicant has moved the present anticipatory bail application seeking bail in Case Crime No.0299 of 2019, under Sections 376, 452, 506, IPC, Police Station Saraikhawaja, District Jaunpur.
I have perused the prosecution story as set up in the F.I.R. and also the anticipatory bail rejection order.
The contention of the counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case; that Pinki Devi happens to be the Jethani of the sister of the applicant; that present FIR has been lodged on 23.07.2019 with regard to an alleged incident of 10.02.2019; that there is dispute between the Jethani and Dewarani, in which the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case; that there are no medical report with regard to the injuries; that the matter needs deeper and fairer investigation before any arrest should be given effect to; that the applicant is willing to participate and cooperate with the investigation. Therefore the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail.
Learned AGA appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the applicant, but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the counsel for the applicant.
Keeping in view the reasons as stated above, the facts and circumstances of the case as have been discussed at the Bar of this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, considering the nature of accusation, the applicant is entitled to be released on anticipatory bail in this case.
In the event of arrest of the applicant, Deepankar, involved in the aforesaid case, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) the applicant will join and participate in each and every aspect of "Investigation" and will lend full assistance to the Investigating Agency even with regard to "discovery of fact" if and when required so by the Investigating Agency or the concerned court;
(ii) the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
iii) the applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police office;
(iv) the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.
In default or misuse of any of the conditions, the Public Prosecutor/Investigating Officer/first informant-complainant is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.
Order Date :- 30.9.2019 VKG
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Deepankar vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 September, 2019
Judges
  • Vipin Sinha
Advocates
  • Kailash Nath